data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a5e7/4a5e7ff25b51f12d925a50c485438414b7ab2924" alt=""
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER I
SAFE THIRD COUNTRY CONCEPT IN INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LAW AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION WITH RESPECT TO TURKEY
I. Introduction
II. Turkey's position with respect to trans-border migratory dynamics
III. Areas of engagement with international law on asylum and migration by Turkey
IV. Evolution and scope of the safe third country concept
1. Emergence and purpose
2. Definition and legal basis
3. Conditions of application
4. Legal issues connected with the safe third country concept
5. Turkey's contributions to the evolution of the safe third country concept
V. Turkey's position as a safe third country with respect to EU member states
CHAPTER II
PROBLEMATIC ISSUES IN TURKISH JUDICIAL PRACTICES REGARDING INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION, REMOVAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETENTION PROCEDURES IN THE LIGHT OF EUROPEAN CASE LAW
I. Problematic issues in Turkish practice revealed through case law analysis for prospective research
II. Problematic issues in Turkish judicial practices regarding international protection procedures
1. Assessment of risk arising from non-state actors
2. Assessment of excuses with respect to indicators of implicit withdrawal of IP applications
3. Assessment of lawfulness of removal during review of withdrawal or rejection of IP applications
III. Problematic issues in Turkish judicial practices regarding removal procedures
1. Implementation of removal grounds related to threat to public security and public order
2. Judicial review in connection with non-specification of country of removal by administration
3. Instances of inconsistency between interim measure and merit decisions of the CC
IV. Problematic Issues in Turkish Judicial Practices regarding Administrative Detention Procedures
1. Jurisdiction of criminal judges with respect to lawfulness of administrative detention
2. Implementation of risk of absconding as a ground for administrative detention for removal purposes
3. Judicial review of de facto administrative detention
4. Compensation for unlawful detention and effective remedy regarding detention conditions
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES